وَلَقَدْ ءَاتَيْنَا مُوسَى ٱلْكِتَٰبَ فَٱخْتُلِفَ فِيهِ · مَّنْ عَمِلَ صَٰلِحًا فَلِنَفْسِهِۦ وَمَنْ أَسَآءَ فَعَلَيْهَا وَمَا رَبُّكَ بِظَلَّٰمٍ لِّلْعَبِيدِ
"We gave Moses (Mūsā) the Book, and disagreement arose over it… Whoever does righteous work, it is for himself; whoever does evil, it is against himself. Your Lord is not one who wrongs His servants."
This is a line treated at several points in this corpus: al-Baqara 2/213 and 2/253, al-Jāthiya 45/17. All of them say the same thing: the disagreement arises after the Book has come. I rely on those treatments.
The function of the verse here is consolation: wa lawlā kalimatun sabaqat min Rabbika la-quḍiya baynahum — had a word not gone before, judgement would have been passed between them. That is, the delay is not indifference.
| Explanation | Ground |
|---|---|
| 1 | The intensive negates multitude: in proportion to the great number of servants |
| 2 | The form conveys no intensive force here; it means no wrong at all |
I transmit both explanations; I do not impose a preference. On either reading the ruling of the sentence comes out in the same place: the recompense is tied to the person's own deed — the preceding sentence had already said this in both directions.