وَمَا قَدَرُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ حَقَّ قَدْرِهِۦ وَٱلْأَرْضُ جَمِيعًا قَبْضَتُهُۥ يَوْمَ ٱلْقِيَٰمَةِ وَٱلسَّمَٰوَٰتُ مَطْوِيَّٰتٌۢ بِيَمِينِهِۦ سُبْحَٰنَهُۥ وَتَعَٰلَىٰ عَمَّا يُشْرِكُونَ
"They did not measure God with the measure due to Him. On the Day of Resurrection the earth is wholly in His grasp, and the heavens are rolled up in His right hand. He is far above what they associate with Him, and exalted beyond it."
The note of tanzīh kept consistently throughout this corpus holds for the expressions in this verse too, and repeating it is obligatory: these expressions cannot be understood in a way that ascribes an organ, a body or a place to God.
And the strongest ground for this is the verse itself: the sentence ends with subḥānahū wa taʿālā ʿammā yushrikūn — that is, the tanzīh has been set down by the verse's own hand immediately after the image.
I record this as my own reading, and its ground is the order of the verse: a likeness is drawn, and then, within the same verse, the likeness is passed beyond. The verse enters its own qualification itself.
Two attitudes are transmitted in the classical commentaries: accepting the wording as it stands and leaving its manner to God (tafwīḍ), or interpreting it in the sense of power and complete disposal (taʾwīl). I transmit both; I do not impose a preference.
وَمَا قَدَرُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ حَقَّ قَدْرِهِ — the root ق-د-ر was treated in al-Qadr and in al-Qamar at 54/49: the core sense is measure. The sentence here conveys an error of measurement: they could not measure Him with the measure due to Him.
And the rest of the verse brings a scale: the earth a handful, the heavens rolled up. That is, the error of measure is met again in the language of measure.