Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

Sabaʾ 34:37

The Qurʾān · Sūra 34: Sabaʾ · verse 37

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

34/37

وَمَآ أَمْوَٰلُكُمْ وَلَآ أَوْلَٰدُكُم بِٱلَّتِى تُقَرِّبُكُمْ عِندَنَا زُلْفَىٰٓ إِلَّا مَنْ ءَامَنَ وَعَمِلَ صَٰلِحًا فَأُو۟لَٰٓئِكَ لَهُمْ جَزَآءُ ٱلضِّعْفِ بِمَا عَمِلُوا۟ وَهُمْ فِى ٱلْغُرُفَٰتِ ءَامِنُونَ

Wa mā amwālukum wa lā awlādukum bi'llatī tuqarribukum ʿindanā zulfā, illā man āmana wa ʿamila ṣāliḥan fa-ulāʾika lahum jazāʾu'ḍ-ḍiʿfi bimā ʿamilū wa hum fi'l-ghurufāti āminūn

"It is not your wealth nor your children that will bring you near to Us. Only the one who believes and does righteous deeds: for such there is a recompense many times over for what they did, and they are secure in the high chambers."

The sentence of judgement in the sūra

This verse is where the sūra arrives. Everything told up to this point is tied here to a ruling.

And the scope of the ruling takes in both peoples of the sūra:

PeopleWhat they hadWhat happened
The house of David and SolomonIron, copper, wind, buildingsThey were commanded to give thanks (13)
SabaʾTwo gardens, safe roadsThey turned away (16)
The mutrafsAmwāl and awlād (35)They took this for a proof

And the thirty-seventh verse gives the measure of all three in a single sentence: what is in your hand does not bring you near.

I record this as my own reading, and its support is the structure of the sūra: the sūra had told of two peoples one after the other, and the same thing had been given to both — abundance. The difference lay not in what was given but in the stance taken towards it. The thirty-seventh verse names that difference.

The word order of the sentence

The sentence negates three times: wa amwālukum wa lā awlādukum bi'llatī tuqarribukum.

And the word bi'llatī must be recorded: a singular feminine relative pronoun. Although two things are named (wealth and children), a singular relative has been used. The lexicographers explain this by taking the two as a single thing — that is, "what is owned". Another explanation is that the relative refers back to the plural al-amwāl (a broken plural, which is treated as feminine). Both explanations are transmitted; since they do not change the sense, I do not impose a preference.

زُلْفَىٰ — root: ز-ل-ف

The root was treated at al-Zumar 39/3 (mā naʿbuduhum illā li-yuqarribūnā ila'llāhi zulfā), where Qāf 50/31 and al-Wāqiʿa were relied on: to draw near, nearness. I do not repeat it here.

And the two verses must be compared, because the word is the same and the sentence is its opposite:

al-Zumar 39/3Sabaʾ 34/37
SentenceMā naʿbuduhum illā li-yuqarribūnā ila'llāhi zulfāMā amwālukum … bi'llatī tuqarribukum ʿindanā zulfā
Who says itThose who associate partners — a claimThe text itself — a ruling
What is taken to bring nearIntermediary beingsWealth and children
Polarity of the sentenceAffirmative — they bring nearNegative — it does not bring near

In both verses the same two words stand together: the verb ق-ر-ب and zulfā. And the sentence framed in al-Zumar as a claim comes in Sabaʾ in the form of a sentence that is rejected.

I record this as my own reading, and its support is the verbal overlap of the two verses: it was recorded at al-Zumar that the dispute is not over existence but over intermediaries. Sabaʾ carries the same dispute one step further: the intermediary is not only idols — wealth and children can be used as an intermediary too. To say "I have this, therefore my standing is good" is another form of leaning on an intermediary.

إِلَّا مَنْ ءَامَنَ وَعَمِلَ صَٰلِحًا — the exception

The lexicographers dwell on what the exception is made from, and this is a dispute about inflection:

ViewWhat the exception is fromSense
1Disconnected (munqaṭiʿ)"But the one who believes and does righteous deeds is another matter" — a fresh ruling
2From an elided element"What will bring you near is only faith and deeds"

Both explanations are transmitted; I do not impose a preference. And both arrive at the same result: the criterion is not wealth but faith and deeds.

And what is striking is this, and I give it as an observation: the verse does not forbid wealth and children, nor count them evil. The only thing it says is that they do not bring near. The sentence, that is, is not a counsel of asceticism but a correction of the criterion.

جَزَآءُ ٱلضِّعْفِḍiʿf: root ض-ع-ف, a fold, a multiple. The construction means "a recompense many times over". And the root of the word is the same as that of ustuḍʿifū (those made weak) in the thirty-first verse.

VerseRoot ض-ع-فSense
31, 32, 33UstuḍʿifūThose made weak
37Jazāʾu'ḍ-ḍiʿfA recompense many times over

The two ends of one root: weakness and multiplication. The lexicographers record this relation: ḍiʿf is a thing's folding over on itself; what folds becomes double. And ḍaʿf (weakness) is strength's failure to fold over on itself. I give this as an observation about the language; I frame no ruling about the meaning.

ٱلْغُرُفَٰت — the plural of ghurfa; root غ-ر-ف: to scoop up in the hand, to take from above; and a room set high. The word is used for the upper-storey room of a house.

And the last word must be recorded: āminūn — in safety. The same word was used in the eighteenth verse for the roads of Sabaʾ: sīrū fīhā layāliya wa ayyāman āminīn.

VerseWhere the amn is
18On the roads — in this world, and it was lost
37In the high chambers — as a recompense

The same root at the two ends of the sūra: one a safety that slipped away, the other a safety that is given. This is an overlap that can be verified within the sūra, and I record it as my own reading.


Roots analysed in this section

ض-ع-ف

The whole of Sūrat Sabaʾ