فَمَا تَنفَعُهُمْ شَفَـٰعَةُ ٱلشَّـٰفِعِينَ
Fa-mā tanfaʿuhum shafāʿatu'l-shāfiʿīn "So the intercession of the intercessors will not avail them."
The centre of the root lights the verse up completely: intercession is the adding of a second beside someone who is not sufficient by himself. That is, intercession is the completing of an insufficiency.
This is one of the subjects of the Qurʾān that must be handled with the greatest care, and it was treated in a balanced way in al-Baqara 2/48.
The balance set up there was this, and it is kept exactly here: the Qurʾān does not reject intercession absolutely; it binds it to permission. Two groups of verses must be read together:
- Verses that appear to reject: "Guard yourselves against a day on which no one will pay anything on another's behalf, and no intercession will be accepted from anyone…" (al-Baqara 2/48); and this verse (74/48).
- The verse that binds it to permission: "Who is there that can intercede with Him except by His permission?" (al-Baqara 2/255 — the Verse of the Throne).
And the solution recorded in al-Baqara holds here as well: the second verse, in the form of a question, states not that intercession is impossible but that it is bound to permission. That is, what is rejected is not intercession itself but the notion of a mediation independent of permission, guaranteed and purchasable.
But this verse adds something, and it must be recorded: the verse describes a situation in which intercession does not work — and it has just enumerated that situation.
That is, the verse does not reject intercession in general; it says that it does not work in a particular situation. And that situation has been described in four items.
I record this reading as my own inference, and I state that it does not upset the balance set up by al-Baqara: there too it was recorded that the question "for whom, and on what condition" was left open.
The same root twice, a verbal noun + the plural of the active participle. In Arabic this is a pattern of widening the scope: "whoever may intercede."
And this widening of scope agrees with the frame recorded in al-Baqara: what is rejected is not a particular mediator but an idea of security built upon mediation.