Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Nisāʾ 4:33

The Qurʾān · Sūra 4: al-Nisāʾ · verse 33

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

4/33

ولكل جعلنا موالي مما ترك الوالدان والأقربون والذين عقدت أيمانكم فآتوهم نصيبهم إن الله كان على كل شيء شهيدا

Wa li-kullin jaʿalnā mawāliya mimmā taraka'l-wālidāni wa'l-aqrabūn, wa'lladhīna ʿaqadat aymānukum fa-ātūhum naṣībahum, inna'llāha kāna ʿalā kulli shayʾin Shahīdā

"For all of what parents and near kin leave We have appointed heirs. And to those whom your oaths have bound, give their share. God is witness over all things."

مَوَٰلِي — the root و-ل-ي

The concrete sense of the root: to be near, to be adjoining. Walī — the one who is near, who takes charge of another's affair; mawlā — both master and freedman, both helper and the one bound. Because of the nearness in its root, the word is used in both directions at once.

The root was treated at al-Anfāl 8/72-75 under the heading "the bond of walāya". I rely on that treatment.

نَصِيب — a third time

The word occurs in this sūra twice in the seventh verse, twice in the thirty-second, and once here.

VerseTo whomFrom what
7To the men and to the womenFrom what is left
32To the men and to the womenFrom what is earned
33Alladhīna ʿaqadat aymānukumFrom what is left

The same word five times in three verses. And the command is the same every time: give the share.

وَٱلَّذِينَ عَقَدَتْ أَيْمَٰنُكُمْ — a disagreement

The expression means literally "those whom your oaths have bound", and there is disagreement in the classical commentaries over whom it means.

ReadingWhoIts ground
AThose with whom a pact has been made — those given a promise of mutual aid and a share in the estateThe sense of binding, of contract, in the word ʿaqd; the use of the plural aymān (oaths)
BThose adopted or attachedThe word's sense of a bond resting on an agreement
CThat the ruling was later abrogated, the verse regulating a transitional periodThat the verses of inheritance (11-12) have determined the shares

All three readings are transmitted; I impose no preference and draw no legal ruling from this. The legal force of this verse is disputed in classical jurisprudence, and that debate is not the subject of this text.

What can be said from the text is this: the verse builds a sentence that counts even a bond not made by blood as holding a share. And this will widen further in the thirty-sixth verse — there the neighbour and the travelling companion will enter the list.


The whole of Sūrat al-Nisāʾ