Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

Āl ʿImrān 3:104-105

The Qurʾān · Sūra 3: Āl ʿImrān · verses 104-105

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

3/104-105

وَلْتَكُن مِّنكُمْ أُمَّةٌ يَدْعُونَ إِلَى ٱلْخَيْرِ · وَلَا تَكُونُوا۟ كَٱلَّذِينَ تَفَرَّقُوا۟ وَٱخْتَلَفُوا۟

Wa'ltakun minkum ummatun yadʿūna ila'l-khayri wa yaʾmurūna bi'l-maʿrūfi wa yanhawna ʿani'l-munkari wa ulāʾika humu'l-mufliḥūn · Wa lā takūnū ka'lladhīna tafarraqū wa'khtalafū min baʿdi mā jāʾahumu'l-bayyināt, wa ulāʾika lahum ʿadhābun ʿaẓīm

"Let there be among you a community calling to the good, enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong. Those are the ones who prosper. · Do not be like those who split apart and fell into division after the clear proofs had come to them. For them there is a great punishment."

مِنكُمْ — the disagreement over the reach of the particle

The lexicographers differ over the function of the particle min in the verse, and the disagreement is not to be concealed:

ReadingWhat minkum meansConsequence
1Tabʿīḍ — "some of you"The duty lies on a group (read as a collective obligation, farḍ kifāya)
2Bayāniyya — "be so, that community being you"The duty lies on all of them

Both are transmitted; I do not impose a preference and I draw no legal ruling from this.

But one datum of the text can be recorded, and I record it: the same three attributes will be laid six verses later, at verse 110, on the whole community (taʾmurūna bi'l-maʿrūfi wa tanhawna ʿani'l-munkar) — and there the particle min is absent. This is the difference of word order between the two verses, and they can also be read as completing each other.

The order of the three verbs

#VerbDirection
1Yadʿūna ila'l-khayrCalling — positive, the widest
2Yaʾmurūna bi'l-maʿrūfEnjoining — the good that is known
3Yanhawna ʿani'l-munkarForbidding — what is rejected

And the order must be recorded: calling first, forbidding last.

I record this as my own reading, and its ground is the order of the verbs: the list opens with the positive and closes with the negative. And the first verb (daʿwa) carries no compulsion at all — it only calls.

مَعْرُوف / مُنكَر — both words are built on the same logic, and their formation must be recorded:

  • مَعْرُوف — root ع-ر-ف: known, recognised. A passive participle.
  • مُنكَر — root ن-ك-ر: not recognised, found strange. A passive participle.

Both are built on the axis of recognition, and both are in the passive pattern. That is, the good is named "what is known" and the evil "what is found strange".

And the three occur three times in the sūra: 104, 110, 114. And the subjects of the three differ:

VerseSubjectWho
104Ummatun minkumA community from among you
110Kuntum khayra ummatinThe whole of the community addressed
114Ummatun qāʾima min ahli'l-kitābA community standing upright from among the People of the Book

Three occurrences, three separate subjects — and the third is from the People of the Book. This is a fact verifiable within the sūra and settles directly how verse 110 is to be read. We shall return to it below.

مِنۢ بَعْدِ مَا جَآءَهُمُ ٱلْبَيِّنَٰتُ — the third occurrence of the note

This construction was treated at verse 19, and a table of five places was drawn up there. I rely on al-Baqara 2/213, al-Shūrā 42/14 and al-Jāthiya 45/17 and do not repeat them.

There are two notes that belong here:

One. The word that comes here is al-bayyināt, not al-ʿilm. At verse 19 of the sūra al-ʿilm came. That is, the sūra uses the same pattern twice with two different words.

VersePatternWhat comes
19Min baʿdi mā jāʾahumu'l-ʿilmKnowledge
105Min baʿdi mā jāʾahumu'l-bayyinātThe clear proofs

Two. In the other occurrences this sentence is a statement; here it is the ground of a prohibition. Wa lā takūnū ka'lladhīna… — "do not be like them". That is, a sentence said about others is turned into an example for the one addressed.

I record this as my own reading, and its ground is the mood of the sentence: the sūra tells this here not as a piece of history but as a possibility. It is assumed that the same thing may happen to the one addressed. And indeed the sūra will record at verse 152 that something like it did happen.

The two occurrences of the root ف-ر-ق in the sūra must be recorded: wa lā tafarraqū (103) — ka'lladhīna tafarraqū (105). One a prohibition, the other an instance of its breach; two verses apart. This was recorded in the table in the introduction.


Roots analysed in this section

ع-ر-فن-ك-ر

The whole of Sūrat Āl ʿImrān