Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Nūr 24:51-52

The Qurʾān · Sūra 24: al-Nūr · verses 51-52

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

24/51-52

إِنَّمَا كَانَ قَوْلَ ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ إِذَا دُعُوٓا۟ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِۦ لِيَحْكُمَ بَيْنَهُمْ أَن يَقُولُوا۟ سَمِعْنَا وَأَطَعْنَا وَأُو۟لَٰٓئِكَ هُمُ ٱلْمُفْلِحُونَ · وَمَن يُطِعِ ٱللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُۥ وَيَخْشَ ٱللَّهَ وَيَتَّقْهِ فَأُو۟لَٰٓئِكَ هُمُ ٱلْفَآئِزُونَ

Innamā kāna qawla'l-muʾminīna idhā duʿū ila'llāhi wa rasūlihī li-yaḥkuma baynahum an yaqūlū samiʿnā wa aṭaʿnā, wa ulāʾika humu'l-mufliḥūn · Wa man yuṭiʿi'llāha wa rasūlahū wa yakhsha'llāha wa yattaqhi fa-ulāʾika humu'l-fāʾizūn

"When they are called to God and His Messenger, that he may judge between them, the word of the believers is only to say: 'We hear and we obey.' It is they who prosper. And whoever obeys God and His Messenger, and fears God and guards himself against Him — it is they who are the winners."

إِنَّمَا — restriction

إِنَّمَا is in Arabic a particle of ḥaṣr (restriction). The word was analysed at al-Ḥujurāt, 49/10 and 49/15; the note there: the particle confines the ruling to a single thing.

And its work here: the word of the believers is only this; no other option is enumerated.

سَمِعْنَا وَأَطَعْنَا — two verbs

The order of the two verbs is worth noting: first samiʿnā (we hear), then aṭaʿnā (we obey).

And this expression is named in the Qurʾān together with its opposite: samiʿnā wa ʿaṣaynā — "we hear and we disobey" (al-Baqara 2/93; al-Nisāʾ 4/46). The same first word, two opposite second words.

The distinction, that is, lies not in the hearing but in what comes after the hearing.

I record this as an observation about the word order.

And it can be compared with the word in the forty-seventh verse:

VerseWhat is saidWhat follows
47āmannā bi'llāhi wa bi'l-rasūli wa aṭaʿnāthumma yatawallā — then he turns away
51samiʿnā wa aṭaʿnāulāʾika humu'l-mufliḥūn

The same word (aṭaʿnā) occurs in both verses. And the difference lies not in the word but in what comes after it.

I record this contrast as my own reading; the two occurrences of the word stand in the text.

ٱلْمُفْلِحُونَ and ٱلْفَآئِزُونَ — two words

فَلَحَ — root ف-ل-ح: analysed at the verse-ending of the thirty-first verse. To split the soil, to till; and from there, to attain what one seeks.

فَازَ — root ف-و-ز: to be delivered, to win, to reach what one wants. Fawz — gain, deliverance. Mafāza — a place of deliverance; and a desert (a usage of tafāʾul the lexicographers record).

The difference between the two words is recorded in the classical sources thus:

WordRootIts picture
مُفْلِحف-ل-ح — to splitWhat splits the soil and comes out — at the end of a process
فَائِزف-و-ز — to winOne who is delivered, who arrives — the outcome

Two verses one after the other, ending with two different words. I record this as an observation about the words.

And in the second verse three verbs are enumerated: yuṭiʿ (obedience), yakhsha (fear), yattaqi (guarding oneself) — and all three from different roots.

خَشِيَ — root خ-ش-ي: the sense the lexicographers record: a fear grounded on knowledge — the fear that arises from knowing the greatness of what is feared.

ٱتَّقَىٰ — root و-ق-ي: to guard oneself, to keep oneself from a thing. The root was taken up in al-Ḥujurāt as the backbone of that sūra.

The difference between the two words is worth noting: the one conveys a feeling, the other a behaviour.


The whole of Sūrat al-Nūr