Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Muʾminūn 23:45-46

The Qurʾān · Sūra 23: al-Muʾminūn · verses 45-46

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

23/45-46

ثُمَّ أَرْسَلْنَا مُوسَىٰ وَأَخَاهُ هَٰرُونَ بِـَٔايَٰتِنَا وَسُلْطَٰنٍ مُّبِينٍ · إِلَىٰ فِرْعَوْنَ وَمَلَإِي۟هِۦ فَٱسْتَكْبَرُوا۟ وَكَانُوا۟ قَوْمًا عَالِينَ

thumma arsalnā mūsā wa akhāhu hārūna bi-āyātinā wa sulṭānin mubīn · ilā firʿawna wa malaʾihī fa'stakbarū wa kānū qawman ʿālīn

"Then We sent Moses and his brother Aaron (Hārūn) with Our signs and a clear warrant: to Pharaoh and his notables. They grew arrogant; they were a people who held themselves high."

وَأَخَاهُ هَٰرُونَ

The word order must be recorded: Aaron is named not by his name first but by the description brotherakhāhu hārūn.

I give this as an observation: in this sūra most of the prophets are unnamed; Aaron's name is given, but a relation is placed in front of it. And this relation will find its counterpart in the language of the objection in the forty-seventh verse: a-nuʾminu li-basharayni mithlināin the dual. The other side addresses the two of them together.

سُلْطَٰنٍ مُّبِين

The root س-ل-ط: to get on top of a thing, to have mastery, to hold power. Sulṭān — it means both power and proof; the lexicographers explain the second sense as "the argument that silences its opponent and prevails".

And āyāt and sulṭān must be recorded together: two separate things are named. The lexicographers explain this in two ways:

ReadingExplanation
1Āyāt are the miracles, and sulṭān is the force of proof they carry — the conjunction is explicative
2They are two separate things: the miracles, and a clear argument

Both explanations are transmitted; I do not impose a preference.

وَكَانُوا۟ قَوْمًا عَالِينَ

The root ع-ل-و: to rise, to be above.

And the word order must be recorded: the sentence is built with kānū (a perfect, reporting continuity). The arrogance, that is, is not a reaction that began with the coming of the messengers — it is a state that existed beforehand.

I give this as my own reading, its ground being the order of the two verbs: first fa'stakbarū (they grew arrogant — the reaction to the call), then wa kānū qawman ʿālīn (they were already a people who held themselves high — the prior state). After telling the reaction, the sentence lays down the ground of the reaction.

And the root will return twice more in the sūra:

VerseWordWho
46qawman ʿālīnPharaoh's company
91la-ʿalā baʿḍuhum ʿalā baʿḍThe supposed gods — prevailing over one another
116fa-taʿāla'llāhu'l-maliku'l-ḥaqqGod

The same root, with three different subjects. This is a distribution that can be verified within the sūra, and I record it as an observation: the verb of rising shifts place across the sūra and is at last attached to a single place.


Roots analysed in this section

ع-ل-وس-ل-ط

The whole of Sūrat al-Muʾminūn