2/47-48 — Preferment and the solitude of the reckoning
"Children of Israel! Remember My favour that I bestowed on you, and that I preferred you above all beings. And guard yourselves against a day when no soul can pay anything for another; when no intercession is accepted from it, no ransom taken, and they are not helped."
This sentence must be read carefully, because it can easily be turned into a claim of racial superiority — and the Qurʾān itself prevents that turn.
First, the context. The verses that follow immediately after this sentence enumerate the repeated failings of the same community. Praise and criticism stand side by side. Had the thing praised been the community itself, the eighty verses that follow would make no sense.
Second, the subject of the preferment. The majority of the classical exegetes understand it as the opportunities given: that a book was given to them, that a great many prophets arose among them, that they were delivered from slavery. The preferment, that is, is a preferment in task and in opportunity, not a preferment of kind. If what is given is more, what will be asked is more too.
Third, the Qurʾān's own measure. The text sets out the measure of honour plainly elsewhere and closes off every claim of descent: "The most honoured of you with God is the one who guards himself most" (al-Ḥujurāt 49/13).
| The road closed | |
|---|---|
| lā tajzī nafsun ʿan nafsin | No soul can pay for another |
| wa lā yuqbalu minhā shafāʿatun | No intercession is accepted |
| wa lā yuʾkhadhu minhā ʿadlun | No ransom is taken |
| wa lā hum yunṣarūn | They are not helped |
All four together say one thing: the reckoning cannot be transferred. To a community told in the previous verse "you were preferred", it is announced immediately afterwards that this is no guarantee. Descent, belonging, privilege in the past — none of these works on that day.
The word عَدْل here means not "justice" but ransom; the primary sense of the root is "what is equal" (the equivalent given in return for something). The same root names justice too, as "equivalence".
A qualification concerning intercession. Read on its own, this verse looks like an absolute rejection of intercession. But elsewhere — indeed within this same sūra — the Qurʾān accepts intercession as tied to permission: "Who is there that can intercede with Him except by His permission?" (al-Baqara 2/255). The picture that emerges when the two verses are read together is this: there is no intercession that stands of itself, by right, that a person could count as a guarantee; what is tied to permission is a separate matter. This subject is among the disputed headings in the history of theology; here I confine myself to setting the two verses side by side and state no side.