Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Naḥl 16:65

The Qurʾān · Sūra 16: al-Naḥl · verse 65

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

16/65

وَٱللَّهُ أَنزَلَ مِنَ ٱلسَّمَآءِ مَآءً فَأَحْيَا بِهِ ٱلْأَرْضَ بَعْدَ مَوْتِهَآ إِنَّ فِى ذَٰلِكَ لَـَٔايَةً لِّقَوْمٍ يَسْمَعُونَ

Wa'llāhu anzala mina'l-samāʾi māʾan fa-aḥyā bihi'l-arḍa baʿda mawtihā, inna fī dhālika la-āyatan li-qawmin yasmaʿūn

"God sent down water from the sky and with it revived the earth after its death. In that there is a sign for a people who hear."

The second enumeration begins

And the opening is a repetition of an item from the first enumeration: the tenth verse too said anzala mina'l-samāʾi māʾan.

The difference must be recorded:

Verse 10Verse 65
The work of the waterLakum minhu sharāb — drink, pastureFa-aḥyā bihi'l-arḍa baʿda mawtihāreviving
The addresseeLakumfor youno lakum
The closing(none — the series goes on)Li-qawmin yasmaʿūn

I record this as my own reading; its ground is the difference between the two verses: in the first enumeration the water was named as a benefit; in the second as a proof. The same fact is thus enumerated twice, and in two different tasks.

And the proof from iḥyāʾ baʿda'l-mawt was treated at many places in this commentary: Fāṭir 35/9 (ka-dhālika'l-nushūr), Qāf 50/11 (ka-dhālika'l-khurūj), Fuṣṣilat 41/39, al-Rūm 30/50. I do not repeat it here.

What belongs here must be recorded: in al-Naḥl no link to the resurrection is added to this proof. Fāṭir says ka-dhālika'l-nushūr, Qāf says ka-dhālika'l-khurūj; al-Naḥl says only la-āyatan li-qawmin yasmaʿūn.

I give this as an observation: here the sūra ties the proof not to resurrection but to hearing. And this fits the series of the sūra's closing verbs — the fifth verb enters here.


The whole of Sūrat al-Naḥl