ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَ سَبْعَ سَمَٰوَٰتٍ وَمِنَ ٱلْأَرْضِ مِثْلَهُنَّ يَتَنَزَّلُ ٱلْأَمْرُ بَيْنَهُنَّ لِتَعْلَمُوٓا۟ أَنَّ ٱللَّهَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَىْءٍ قَدِيرٌ وَأَنَّ ٱللَّهَ قَدْ أَحَاطَ بِكُلِّ شَىْءٍ عِلْمًا
Allāhu'lladhī khalaqa sabʿa samāwātin wa mina'l-arḍi mithlahunn, yatanazzalu'l-amru baynahunna li-taʿlamū anna'llāha ʿalā kulli shayʾin qadīr, wa anna'llāha qad aḥāṭa bi-kulli shayʾin ʿilmā
"God is the one who created seven heavens, and of the earth their like. The command descends among them — so that you may know that God has power over everything, and that God has encompassed everything in knowledge."
The most unexpected move of the sūra. For eleven verses the waiting period, the dwelling, maintenance, the reckoning; and in the last verse, suddenly, seven heavens.
This transition can be explained, and the explanation rests on a single word: يَتَنَزَّلُ ٱلْأَمْرُ.
I gave the eight occurrences of the word amr in the sūra above (in the discussion of 65/8) in the form of a table. The last of them is here.
And what it does is this: the command set inside a household at the beginning of the sūra and the command descending among the layers of the cosmos are named with the same word.
At what time a man is to divorce his wife, which period he is to count, how much he is to pay — these are amru'llāh (65/5). And al-amr descends among seven heavens (65/12).
The two are the same word. In English one is rendered "ruling", the other "command" or "affair", and the link breaks. In Arabic it does not break.
That is, the verse closes all the rulings of the sūra with a movement that changes the scale: the order inside the house and the order of the cosmos are the two ends of the same command.
I offer this as a reading. That the word is the same is the text's datum; binding the two ends together is my inference.
That is, no cosmology is being recounted. A piece of knowledge is aimed at, and what that knowledge is is given in two items:
1. أَنَّ ٱللَّهَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَىْءٍ قَدِيرٌ — He has power over everything. 2. أَنَّ ٱللَّهَ قَدْ أَحَاطَ بِكُلِّ شَىْءٍ عِلْمًا — He has encompassed everything in knowledge.
65/1 had ended thus: لَا تَدْرِى — "you do not know." 65/12 ends thus: قَدْ أَحَاطَ بِكُلِّ شَىْءٍ عِلْمًا — "He has encompassed everything in knowledge."
And this explains the whole structure of the sūra. In the first verse a period was set because the human being was told "you do not know". In the last verse it is said who does know. Every ruling between the two fills the distance between the one who does not know and the one who knows.
I record this as the soundest internal link of the sūra, and I state that it is my own reading. That the two expressions stand at the two ends of the sūra is the text's datum.
قَدِير — root ق د ر, in the sūra for the third time. At 65/3 qadran (measure), at 65/7 qudira (was straitened), here qadīr (having power). Two of the three branches of meaning recorded in al-Qadr, and the sense of power, side by side in the same sūra.
أَحَاطَ — root ح و ط (ḥ-w-ṭ): to turn about, to encompass. Ḥāʾiṭ (a wall), iḥāṭa, muḥīṭ (encompassing; and the ocean). The concrete sense of the root is to enclose about — as a garden is enclosed by a wall.
عِلْمًا — a specifying accusative: "in respect of knowledge". It determines from which side the encompassing is. That is, the encompassing is not by power but by knowledge.
"And of the earth their like" — this expression does not say what is like what. Like in number? In structure? In manner of creation?
Different explanations have been transmitted in the classical commentaries on this, and no definite preference has been made among them. In some explanations likeness in number comes forward, in others likeness in creation.
And I shall not insert a piece of modern cosmology here. This is the plain rule of the method (Method): no hunting for scientific miracles, no forcing a piece of modern knowledge onto a verse. The verse gives no description of the structure of heaven and earth; it describes an encompassing and a descent. The verse's own sentence says this too: li-taʿlamū — what is to be known is not cosmography but power and knowledge.
Root ن ز ل, in the تَفَعُّل (tafaʿʿul) form. This form conveys here continuity and repetition: yatanazzalu — "it keeps descending", "it descends by degrees".
In al-Qadr the form of the same root in the tafʿīl pattern (nazzala) was treated, and it was recorded there: descending piece by piece, in repetition. The tafaʿʿul form too carries a similar continuity, but in a reflexive tone.
And the verb's coming in the imperfect is meaningful: the descent is not a finished event but a continuing state. It is not said that the command came down once and was over; it is coming down.
This says something when one looks back at the rulings of the sūra: if the command is continually descending, obedience to it is a continual business too. It is not an obligation discharged once and closed.
Root ب ي ن. Analysed in full in al-Bayyina; I do not repeat it. A reminder: at the centre of the root there is the space between two things, and in Arabic bayn announces both the space between and the separation.
And the word's use here carries an echo within the sūra: at 65/6 وَأْتَمِرُوا۟ بَيْنَكُم بِمَعْرُوفٍ — "consult between you in the recognised good way."
Two bayns: one the consultation between two people, the other the descent among seven layers. The same word, in the same sūra, on two scales.
I record this as an observation. Bayn is a very common word and I draw no structural claim from this proximity; but because it stands in the same direction as the change of scale the sūra sets up with the word amr, I found it worth recording.