فَضْلًا مِّن رَّبِّكَ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ هُوَ ٱلْفَوْزُ ٱلْعَظِيمُ
The word is in the accusative and the lexicographers transmit several readings as to what it attaches to:
| Reading | What it says |
|---|---|
| A causal object | "So that it might be a bounty" — the reason for the guarding |
| An absolute object | In place of the verbal noun of the verb waqāhum: "…He guarded them, guarding them as a bounty" |
| A circumstantial accusative | The state of the guarding: "in the state of a bounty" |
| Verse | Expression | What it qualifies |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | raḥmatan min rabbika | The sending down of the Book |
| 57 | faḍlan min rabbika | Being guarded from the Fire |
Its concrete sense: a thing's being more than is required, its increasing. Faḍl — what is left over, what remains. Fuḍūl — surpluses. Fāḍil — one who is superior: who goes beyond what is expected of him.
And the logic of the root is worth recording: faḍl is the part above what is deserved. The word, that is, carries within itself a gratuitousness — what is deserved would not be faḍl but ajr (a wage) or jazāʾ (a requital).
Since the fifty-first verse the persons described have been named al-muttaqīn — that is, ones who have done something. They guarded themselves, they took care, they held themselves back.
| Step | Verse | Who does it |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 51 — al-muttaqīn | They — they guarded themselves |
| 2 | 56 — wa waqāhum | God — He guarded them |
| 3 | 57 — faḍlan min rabbika | And this was a bounty |
The sentence, that is, comes to the end of a chain of deserving built over two verses, and takes the outcome outside deserving.
This reading is mine; the order of the three verses and the definition of the word faḍl are verifiable.
And this agrees with the general stance of the sūra: in the sixth verse the coming of the Book too was named a raḥma — that is, not by way of deserving.
And in the last occurrence the subject of the pattern is not a person but a thing: dhālika — "this".
The link between the two senses is made by the lexicographers thus, and it is striking: the desert's being called mafāza is either an optimistic naming (since it is a place of destruction, the opposite is said), or it is because deliverance from it is hoped for. I issue no firm ruling; I transmit it as a relation established by the lexicographers.
I record this as my own reading, and it connects with the next verse: the sentence does not say "this is the gain". The deliverance is the thing said in the preceding verse: being guarded from the punishment of the blaze. The content of the fawz, that is, is given by the text itself.
ٱلْعَظِيم — the root ع-ظ-م. Its concrete sense: bone (ʿaẓm). ʿAẓīm — big-boned, great. The concrete core of the root is an idea of a skeleton: the load-bearing, hard part of a thing.