Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Naḥl 16:71

The Qurʾān · Sūra 16: al-Naḥl · verse 71

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

16/71

وَٱللَّهُ فَضَّلَ بَعْضَكُمْ عَلَىٰ بَعْضٍ فِى ٱلرِّزْقِ فَمَا ٱلَّذِينَ فُضِّلُوا۟ بِرَآدِّى رِزْقِهِمْ عَلَىٰ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَٰنُهُمْ فَهُمْ فِيهِ سَوَآءٌ أَفَبِنِعْمَةِ ٱللَّهِ يَجْحَدُونَ

Wa'llāhu faḍḍala baʿḍakum ʿalā baʿḍin fi'l-rizq, fa-ma'lladhīna fuḍḍilū bi-rāddī rizqihim ʿalā mā malakat aymānuhum fa-hum fīhi sawāʾ, a-fa-bi-niʿmati'llāhi yajḥadūn

"God has favoured some of you over others in provision. Those who are favoured do not hand their provision over to those their right hands possess, so as to be their equals in it. Do they then knowingly deny God's favour?"

How the parable is built

The verse gives an example, and the example is taken from the addressee's own life.

And its logic must be recorded, because it is indirect:

StepExpressionWhat it says
1Faḍḍala baʿḍakum ʿalā baʿḍin fi'l-rizqThe fact: provision is not distributed equally
2Fa-ma'lladhīna fuḍḍilū bi-rāddī rizqihim…The observation: the favoured man does not share his advantage and level himself with the others
3A-fa-bi-niʿmati'llāhi yajḥadūnThe question

The exegetes dwell on the work of the second step, and two readings are transmitted:

ReadingThe work of the parable
1The contradiction of associating partners: the man who accepts no partner in his own property accepts partners in God's dominion
2The denial of the favour: the advantage given is not shared, and the giver is met with ingratitude besides

Both readings are transmitted; I do not impose a preference.

The first reading has a ground outside the verse, and it must be recorded: at al-Rūm, 30/28, a parable of exactly the same logic occurs (hal lakum min mā malakat aymānukum min shurakāʾa fī mā razaqnākum fa-antum fīhi sawāʾ) and was treated there. The two verses use the same words: mā malakat aymānukum, fī mā razaqnākum, fa-antum fīhi sawāʾ. This is an overlap verifiable across the sūras.

The difference must be recorded:

al-Rūm 30/28al-Naḥl 16/71
The kind of sentenceA questionhal lakum … min shurakāʾaA statementfa-mā … bi-rāddī
What is askedWould you accept partners?(no question is put; a fact is announced)
The closingKa-dhālika nufaṣṣilu'l-āyāti li-qawmin yaʿqilūnA-fa-bi-niʿmati'llāhi yajḥadūn

I record this as my own reading, its ground being the difference of the closings: al-Rūm ends the example with a call to reason; al-Naḥl ties the same example to an accounting of favour. The sūra draws a shared parable onto its own backbone.

يَجْحَدُونَ — root: ج-ح-د

The root was treated at al-Aḥqāf, 46/26, and the connection the lexicographers record was given there: arḍun juḥād — barren, arid ground. Denial is thus described not as ignorance but as a ground that does not give back what it has taken. I rely on that treatment.

And I record that the word falls very much in its place here: juḥūd is denial against knowledge. And the subject of the verse is the denial of the source of an advantage that is known. The eighty-third verse will say this outright: yaʿrifūna niʿmata'llāhi thumma yunkirūnahā — "they recognise it, then they deny it."


The whole of Sūrat al-Naḥl