Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

Yūnus 10:19-20

The Qurʾān · Sūra 10: Yūnus · verses 19-20

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

10/19-20

وَمَا كَانَ ٱلنَّاسُ إِلَّآ أُمَّةً وَٰحِدَةً فَٱخْتَلَفُوا۟ · وَيَقُولُونَ لَوْلَآ أُنزِلَ عَلَيْهِ ءَايَةٌ مِّن رَّبِّهِۦ فَقُلْ إِنَّمَا ٱلْغَيْبُ لِلَّهِ فَٱنتَظِرُوٓا۟ إِنِّى مَعَكُم مِّنَ ٱلْمُنتَظِرِينَ

"People were no more than a single community; then they fell into disagreement. Had a word not gone forth beforehand from your Lord, judgment would long since have been given between them over what they disagreed about. · They say: 'Should a sign not have been sent down to him from his Lord?' Say: 'The unseen belongs to God alone. So wait; I am with you among those who wait.'"

أُمَّةً وَٰحِدَةًthe construct occurs in more than one place in the Qurʾān and was treated from another side at al-Zukhruf 43/33 (wa lawlā an yakūna'n-nāsu ummatan wāḥidatan). I rely on that treatment.

And the word order here must be recorded: mā kāna … illā — the pattern of restriction. The information "people were at the beginning a single community" is given, that is, with a restriction: they were nothing else.

كَلِمَةٌ سَبَقَتْ مِن رَّبِّكَ — "a word that had gone forth beforehand from your Lord". The construct will come back in the thirty-third and ninety-sixth verses of the sūra in the form ḥaqqat kalimatu rabbik.

VerseExpressionWhat it does
19Kalimatun sabaqat — gone forth beforehandThe deferral of judgment
33Ḥaqqat kalimatu rabbika ʿala'lladhīna fasaqūThe coming true of the judgment
96Ḥaqqat ʿalayhim kalimatu rabbika lā yuʾminūnThe same judgment, again
64Lā tabdīla li-kalimāti'llāhUnalterability

Four occurrences, one root. I record this as an observation: the sūra ties the deferral, the coming true and the unalterability all to the same word.

لَوْلَآ أُنزِلَ عَلَيْهِ ءَايَةٌ — the demand for a sign

This demand was treated in many places in the index: at al-Raʿd 13/7 the same sentence (law lā unzila ʿalayhi āyatun min rabbih) occurred and came back there twice more; the same line was treated at al-Furqān 25/21 (law lā unzila ʿalayna'l-malāʾika) and at al-Kahf 18/57. I rely on that treatment.

And the answer Yūnus gives must be recorded, because it differs from the others: innama'l-ghaybu lillāh.

PlaceAnswer
al-Raʿd 13/7Innamā anta mundhira description of the task
al-Raʿd 13/38Mā kāna li-rasūlin an yaʾtiya bi-āyatin illā bi-idhni'llāhauthority
Yūnus 10/20Innama'l-ghaybu lillāhthe field of knowledge

Yūnus ties the demand to a question of knowledge. I record this as my own reading, and its ground is the wording of the answer: what is asked for is a sign that would come from an unseen field; and by stating whose that field is, the one who demands it is left standing outside the door.

فَٱنتَظِرُوٓا۟ إِنِّى مَعَكُم مِّنَ ٱلْمُنتَظِرِينَ — a word-for-word repetition

This sentence will be repeated word for word in the hundred and second verse of the sūra:

Verse 20: fa'ntaẓirū innī maʿakum mina'l-muntaẓirīn Verse 102: qul fa'ntaẓirū innī maʿakum mina'l-muntaẓirīn

The difference is a single word: in the hundred and second verse qul (say) stands at the head.

This is a repetition that can be counted and verified within the sūra. And the contexts of the two places differ: in the twentieth verse it answers the demand for a sign, in the hundred and second the awaiting of what befell the earlier peoples.

I record this as my own reading: the same sentence stands like a parenthesis set at the two ends of the sūra. And what the sentence does is worth recording: the waiting of the other side is accepted, but the speaker steps into the same rankinnī maʿakum. The waiting, that is, is not refused; it is shared.


The whole of Sūrat Yūnus